State v. Dahlquist
Court of Appeals of North Carolina
1Opinion of the Court
DILLON, Judge.
Kevin James Dahlquist (“Defendant”) appeals from a judgment convicting him of driving while impaired, arguing the trial court improperly denied his motion to suppress evidence from a compelled blood sample. We affirm.
I. Facts and Procedural History
In the early morning hours of Saturday, 26 September 2009, Officer Charles Jamieson of the Charlotte-Mecklenburg Police Department was working a checkpoint for impaired driving. The checkpoint was equipped with a Blood Alcohol Testing (“BAT”) mobile, which housed an intoxilyzer for determining a suspect’s blood alcohol level. The BAT…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Missouri v. McNeelySupreme Court of the United States · 2013
- State v. SalinasSupreme Court of North Carolina · 2012
- State v. RoysterCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2012
- State v. FletcherCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2010
3Cited by6 opinions
- Thomas v. WilliamsCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2015
- State v. BurrisCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2017
- State v. BucklewCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2021
- State v. BucklewCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2021
- State v. BurrisCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2017
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.