Legal Opinion

State v. Dahlquist

Court of Appeals of North Carolina

Decided December 3, 2013No. COA13-276PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

DILLON, Judge.

Kevin James Dahlquist (“Defendant”) appeals from a judgment convicting him of driving while impaired, arguing the trial court improperly denied his motion to suppress evidence from a compelled blood sample. We affirm.

I. Facts and Procedural History

In the early morning hours of Saturday, 26 September 2009, Officer Charles Jamieson of the Charlotte-Mecklenburg Police Department was working a checkpoint for impaired driving. The checkpoint was equipped with a Blood Alcohol Testing (“BAT”) mobile, which housed an intoxilyzer for determining a suspect’s blood alcohol level. The BAT…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Missouri v. McNeelySupreme Court of the United States · 2013
  2. State v. SalinasSupreme Court of North Carolina · 2012
  3. State v. RoysterCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2012
  4. State v. FletcherCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2010

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Thomas v. WilliamsCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2015
  2. State v. BurrisCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2017
  3. State v. BucklewCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2021
  4. State v. BucklewCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2021
  5. State v. BurrisCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2017

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API