Legal Opinion

Rutherford v. Elliott

Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit

Decided May 9, 1927No. 4849PublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Per curiam

This is an appeal under section 25a of the Bankruptcy Act The appeal was allowed by the District Judge. Appellee now moves to dismiss because the allowance was not made by this court, and insists that the effect of the amendment of May 27, 1926, is to require such special allowance. The amendment was made in the language of section 24b. As amended, it reads:

“Such power shall be exercised by appeal and in the form and manner of an appeal, except in the eases mentioned in said section 25 to be allowed in the discretion of the appellate court.” 44 Stat. 664.

In view of the known purpose of this…

2Cited by12 opinions

  1. Broders v. LageCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1928
  2. Stanley's Incorporated Store No. 3 v. EarlCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1928
  3. Clements v. ConyersCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1928
  4. Credit Alliance Cor. v. Atlantic, Pacific & Gulf Refining Co.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1935
  5. Deeley v. Cincinnati Art Pub. Co.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1928

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API