Legal Opinion

Ballenger v. Drook

Indiana Supreme Court

Decided April 7, 1885No. 11,462PublishedCited by 10 opinions

From the Grant Circuit Court.

1Opinion of the CourtZollars, C. J.

A demurrer having been sustained to appellant’s complaint, he appealed, and assigns that ruling as error.

The material averments of the complaint may be summa*173rized as follows: John Drook died testate in 1870, the owner of real and personal property, and left surviving his wife and ten children. After a provision for the payment of debts and funeral expenses, there is a provision in the will for the disposition of the remainder of the personal estate, and of the real estate, as follows: “ The remainder thereof” (personal estate), “if any there be, I give and bequeath unto my wife Saloma, to…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Milligan v. PooleIndiana Supreme Court · 1871
  2. Gimbel v. StolteIndiana Supreme Court · 1877
  3. Spray v. RodmanIndiana Supreme Court · 1873
  4. Wilson's v. RuddIndiana Supreme Court · 1862
  5. Simonds v. HarrisIndiana Supreme Court · 1884

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Koons v. MellettIndiana Supreme Court · 1889
  2. Amos v. AmosIndiana Supreme Court · 1889
  3. Marvin v. BowlbyMichigan Supreme Court · 1905
  4. Comer v. LightIndiana Supreme Court · 1911
  5. Nelson v. NelsonIndiana Court of Appeals · 1905

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API