Hamlin v. Sourwine
Indiana Court of Appeals
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
NAJAM, Judge.
STATEMENT OF THE CASE
In this ’ appeal we consider the circumstances under which a party may be deemed to have relinquished a timely jury trial demand. Vernon Hamlin, Anderson Inns, Inc., Ellsworth Cook, Jr., and Dean Richards (collectively “Anderson Inns”) appeal from the trial court’s judgment in favor of Jack, Patsy and James Sourwine (the “Sourwines”) and Sourwine Construction Corporation (“SCC”). Over the objection of Anderson Inns, the court conducted a bench trial. The court found that Anderson Inns had engaged in malicious prosecution when it filed its “Complaint to…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Anderson v. AndersonIndiana Court of Appeals · 1979
- Huffman v. Monroe County Community School Corp.Indiana Supreme Court · 1992
- Randolph v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1954
- Gomez v. AdamsIndiana Court of Appeals · 1984
- South Eastern Indiana Natural Gas Co. v. IngramIndiana Court of Appeals · 1993
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by12 opinions
- MC Welding and MacHining Co. v. KotwaIndiana Court of Appeals · 2006
- Stevens v. StateIndiana Court of Appeals · 1997
- Smith v. WashingtonIndiana Court of Appeals · 1999
- Scott v. CrussenIndiana Court of Appeals · 2000
- Corrigan v. Al-Trim Corp.Indiana Court of Appeals · 1998
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.