Legal Opinion
Minskoff v. Fidelity & Casualty Co.
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
Decided July 6, 1967PublishedCited by 6 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtSteuer, J.
Plaintiffs were defendants in a prior action in which Harsh Investment Corp. was plaintiff. An attachment was obtained and a levy made against their property. Defendant supplied the bond for the attachment. There were several defendants in that action and the proportion of the bond applicable to plaintiffs was $60,000. On motion of the plaintiffs here (defendants there), the attachment was vacated and Harsh’s complaint was dismissed. The judgment of dismissal was affirmed in this court, Harsh Inv. Corp. v. Minskoff (24 A D 2d 842, mot. for lv. to app. den. 17 N Y 2d 421). Thereupon plaintiffs…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Apollinaris Co. v. VenableNew York Court of Appeals · 1892
- Thropp v. ErbNew York Court of Appeals · 1930
- Elsman v. Glens Falls Indemnity Co.New York Supreme Court · 1933
3Cited by6 opinions
- Victrix Steamship Co. v. Salen Dry Cargo A.B.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1987
- Victrix Steamship Co. v. Salen Dry CargoCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1987
- Correspondent Services Corp. v. J.V.W. Investment Ltd.District Court, S.D. New York · 2007
- Astra Oil Trading NV v. PRSI Trading Co. LPDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2011
- Rashi Textiles, U.S.A., Inc. v. Rhomberg Textil Gesellschaft M.B.H., of AustriaDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1994
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.