Legal Opinion
Kernochan v. United States
United States Court of Claims
Decided November 6, 1939No. 44023PublishedCited by 14 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
WHITAKER, Judge.
On October 1, 1920, the decedent was Chief Justice of the Court of Special Sessions of the City of New York. As such he was eligible to become a member of the New York City Employees’ Retirement System. On this date he made application to become a member and was accepted.
Under the provisions of the law providing for the New York City Employees’ Retirement System (Laws of New York, 1920 Edition, Vol. 2, Chap. 427, pp. 1056— 1078), and under the provisions of the application made by the decedent in this case, he was entitled to retire at the age of 60 years; whereupon, he was…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Burnet v. HarmelSupreme Court of the United States · 1932
- Lyeth v. HoeySupreme Court of the United States · 1938
- In re the Estate of FitzsimmonsNew York Surrogate's Court · 1936
- In re the Estate of O'DonnellNew York Surrogate's Court · 1934
3Cited by14 opinions
- Helvering v. Le GierseSupreme Court of the United States · 1941
- In re the Estate of NewtonNew York Surrogate's Court · 1941
- Hanner v. GlennDistrict Court, W.D. Kentucky · 1953
- In re the Estate of RhodesNew York Surrogate's Court · 1949
- Chew's Estate v. CommissionerCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1945
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.