Legal Opinion

State v. Union Pacific Railroad

Nebraska Supreme Court

Decided December 24, 1992No. Nos. S-89-1144, S-89-1345, S-89-1347PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtBoslaugh, J.

These cases are now before this court on the motion of the *98appellee for rehearing. The original opinion is reported at State v. Union Pacific RR. Co., 241 Neb. 675, 490 N.W.2d 461 (1992).

The appellee has called our attention to the fact that Neb. Rev. Stat. § 76-107 (Reissue 1990) is not applicable. See Neb. Rev. Stat. § 76-2,104(5) (Reissue 1990).

Upon consideration of the motion, we have concluded that the possibilities of reverter contained in the right-of-way deeds to the defendant were void as restraints on alienation and that the last paragraph on page 686 of the opinion which appears in…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. State v. Union Pacific RailroadNebraska Supreme Court · 1992
  2. Cast v. NATIONAL BANK OF COM. T. & S. ASS'N OF LINCOLNNebraska Supreme Court · 1971
  3. Falls City v. Missouri Pacific Railroad CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1972

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Spanish Oaks, Inc. v. Hy-Vee, Inc.Nebraska Supreme Court · 2003
  2. Baker's Supermarkets, Inc. v. FeldmanNebraska Supreme Court · 1993
  3. Poppleton v. Village Realty Co., Inc.Nebraska Supreme Court · 1995
  4. Elliott v. First Security BankNebraska Supreme Court · 1996
  5. City of Lincoln v. Townhouser, Inc.Nebraska Supreme Court · 1995

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API