Legal Opinion
Metal Products Workers Union, Local 1645 v. Torrington Co.
District Court, D. Connecticut
Decided May 1, 1965No. Civ. 10624PublishedCited by 19 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
TIMBERS, Chief Judge.
QUESTION PRESENTED
Respondent’s motion for summary judgment, pursuant to Rule 56, Fed.R. Civ.P., presents the question whether this Court should vacate an arbitrator’s award that a recall after strike grievance is not arbitrable under the collective bargaining agreement between the parties, the issue of arbitrability having been the only issue expressly submitted by the parties to the arbitrator. The Court holds the arbitrator’s award should not be vacated and accordingly grants respondent’s motion for summary judgment.
FACTS
Petitioner Metal Products Workers Union, Local…
2Cases cited27 opinions
- United Steelworkers v. Warrior & Gulf Navigation Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1960
- United Steelworkers v. Enterprise Wheel & Car Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1960
- United Steelworkers v. American Manufacturing Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1960
- John Wiley & Sons, Inc. v. LivingstonSupreme Court of the United States · 1964
- Wilko v. SwanSupreme Court of the United States · 1953
22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by19 opinions
- Board of Education v. Prince George's County Educators' Ass'nCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1987
- Hill v. Aro CorporationDistrict Court, N.D. Ohio · 1967
- The Torrington Company, Inc. v. Metal Products Workers Union Local 1645, Uaw-Afl-Cio, and International Unionuaw-Afl-CioCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1965
- Newark Stereotypers' Union No. 18 v. Newark Morning Ledger Co.District Court, D. New Jersey · 1966
- Bd. of Educ. v. PG CO. EDUCATORS'ASS'NCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1987
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.