Curry v. Interstate Express, Inc.
Court of Civil Appeals of Alabama
1Opinion of the Court
ROBERTSON, Presiding Judge.
This is an appeal from the trial court’s dismissal of Otis Randy Curry’s claim for workmen’s compensation benefits.
On appeal, Curry asserts by brief that the judgment entered by the trial court is inadequate in that it contains no statement of law, findings of fact, or conclusions of law as required by § 25-5-88, Code 1975. The employer, appellee, chose not to file a brief.
The trial court’s judgment is as follows:
“This cause being regularly set and coming on to be heard, the parties being personally present and represented by their attorneys of record, the Court…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Bass v. Cowikee MillsSupreme Court of Alabama · 1952
- Henderson v. JohnsonCourt of Civil Appeals of Alabama · 1972
- Dennis v. Gamble's, Inc.Court of Civil Appeals of Alabama · 1980
- Kearly v. Peterman Lumber CompanyCourt of Civil Appeals of Alabama · 1970
- Morton v. Blue Bell, Inc.Court of Civil Appeals of Alabama · 1989
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Ex Parte CurrySupreme Court of Alabama · 1992
- LEE APPAREL CO., INC. v. HartCourt of Civil Appeals of Alabama · 1993
- Curry v. Interstate Express, Inc.Court of Civil Appeals of Alabama · 1991
- Alabama Electric Co. v. DobbinsCourt of Civil Appeals of Alabama · 1999
- Curry v. Interstate Express, Inc.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1992