La Petite Auberge, Inc. v. Rhode Island Commission for Human Rights
Supreme Court of Rhode Island
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
WEISBERGER, Justice.
These appeals were taken from an order of the Superior Court which directed that certain discovery procedures take place pri- or to an administrative hearing before the Rhode Island Commission for Human Rights (the commission). Brought into issue in this case is the responsibility of the commission to make its investigative and information — gathering powers available to parties to a contested proceeding before it.
The case grew out of a dispute between Ann Marie Wall (Wall) and La Petite Au-berge, Inc. (L’Auberge), her former employer. Wall was a luncheon waitress…
2Cases cited22 opinions
- Richardson v. PeralesSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
- Hickman v. TaylorSupreme Court of the United States · 1947
- Tumey v. OhioSupreme Court of the United States · 1927
- Withrow v. LarkinSupreme Court of the United States · 1975
- United States v. Procter & Gamble Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1958
17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by61 opinions
- Pet v. Department of Health ServicesSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1988
- Mesolella v. City of ProvidenceSupreme Court of Rhode Island · 1986
- Pollard v. Acer GroupSupreme Court of Rhode Island · 2005
- Bradford Associates v. Rhode Island Division of PurchasesSupreme Court of Rhode Island · 2001
- Long v. Dell, Inc.Supreme Court of Rhode Island · 2009
56 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.