Legal Opinion

Korren v. Eli Lilly & Co.

New York Supreme Court

Decided August 30, 1990PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION OF THE COURT

Ira Gammerman, J.

As a direct result of the decision of the Court of Appeals in Hymowitz v Lilly & Co. (73 NY2d 487), the plaintiff herein moves, on behalf of herself and the numerous plaintiffs in the over 400 DES (diethylstilbestrol) actions currently pending before this court, for an order "deeming all defendants named and served in any DES action a defendant in each pending action”. Such an order would allegedly serve to alleviate the hardship created by the Court of Appeals adoption in Hymowitz of a market share theory as the measure of a DES producer’s liability.…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Connell v. HaydenAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1981
  2. Hymowitz v. Eli Lilly & Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1989
  3. Bichler v. Eli Lilly & Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1982
  4. Brock v. BuaAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1981
  5. Raschel v. RishNew York Court of Appeals · 1986

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Annunziato v. City of New YorkAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1996
  2. Glussi v. Fortune Brands, Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2000
  3. Warren v. Cedar Hill Cemetery Ass'nAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2000

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API