Legal Opinion
United States v. Samuel Rodger Raleigh
Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit
Decided January 17, 2002No. 00-1107PublishedCited by 14 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
DAUGHTREY, Circuit Judge.
Pursuant to a plea agreement with the government, the defendant, Samuel Raleigh, pleaded guilty in federal court to possession of a stolen, firearm, in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 922(g). He now appeals the district court’s imposition of a sentence that (1) included an enhancement because the weapon was stolen and (2) was ordered to run consecutively to Raleigh’s outstanding state sentences. Raleigh insists that the enhancement amounted to “double counting” and that consecutive sentencing in this case was legally improper. We find no error and affirm.
FACTUAL AND…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- United States v. Scottie Ray HurstCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2000
- United States v. Sadie Latouf (95-4095), Joseph N. Sarich (95-4112), Mario Guerrieri (95-4115), Richard A. Harakal (95-4233)Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1997
- United States v. Danny Owens (95-6357), Blake Owens (95-6405), Ira John Woodfin (95-6631), and Kaye Miller Bennett (95-6632)Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1998
- United States v. BrownCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1999
- UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Willie TURNIPSEED, Defendant-AppellantCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1998
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by14 opinions
- United States v. Heard, DerrickCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2004
- United States v. JacksonCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2011
- United States v. Alonzo Fulton HoverCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2002
- United States v. GoffCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2003
- United States v. HartCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2004
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.