State v. Baker
Supreme Court of Kansas
1Opinion of the Court
The opinion of the court was delivered by
Luckert, J.:
In this appeal, Mark Anthony Baker raises three sentencing issues. In the first issue, he argues no reasonable person would agree with the district court judge’s decision to impose consecutive sentences and, therefore, the judge abused his discretion. We reject this argument, concluding a reasonable person could agree with the judge’s decision. In two other issues, Baker raises *483arguments that are contrary to well-settled rulings of this court, and he fails to present any new arguments to persuade us to abandon our prior rulings.…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Apprendi v. New JerseySupreme Court of the United States · 2000
- State v. WardSupreme Court of Kansas · 2011
- State v. IvorySupreme Court of Kansas · 2002
- State v. BrownSupreme Court of Kansas · 2012
- State v. JohnsonSupreme Court of Kansas · 2008
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by20 opinions
- State v. HiltSupreme Court of Kansas · 2014
- State v. MosherSupreme Court of Kansas · 2014
- State v. MartinezCourt of Appeals of Kansas · 2014
- State v. PowellSupreme Court of Kansas · 2018
- State v. BeloneCourt of Appeals of Kansas · 2015
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.