Legal Opinion
Seitzman v. Hudson River Associates
New York Supreme Court
Decided April 26, 1989PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION OF THE COURT
Harold Baer, Jr., J.
In this action, plaintiffs seek both compensatory and punitive damages resulting from defendant’s alleged wrongful acts *1069in connection with a contract for the sale to plaintiffs of a cooperative apartment. Plaintiffs are two physicians who entered into said contract with the defendant, the sponsor and selling agent of the cooperative apartment, on October 16, 1985. Plaintiffs sought to purchase the apartment for use as a medical office. Plaintiffs allege that when one of the partners in Hudson River Associates learned that plaintiff Peter Seitzman treats…
2Cases cited17 opinions
- Smith v. WadeSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
- Murphy v. American Home Products Corp.New York Court of Appeals · 1983
- Borkowski v. BorkowskiNew York Court of Appeals · 1976
- Batavia Lodge No. 196 v. New York State Division of Human RightsNew York Court of Appeals · 1974
- Rupert v. SellersAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1975
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Alvin Joel TYLER, Plaintiff-Appellee Cross-Appellant, v. BETHLEHEM STEEL CORPORATION, Defendant-Appellant Cross-AppelleeCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1992
- Thoreson v. Penthouse International, Ltd.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1992
- Pereira v. Centel Corp. (In Re Argo Communications Corp.)United States Bankruptcy Court, S.D. New York · 1991
- Conan v. Equitable Capital Management Corp.District Court, S.D. New York · 1991