Legal Opinion

Miller v. Foster

Texas Supreme Court

Decided March 11, 1890No. 2496PublishedCited by 15 opinions

Appeal from Gonzales. Tried below before Hon. George McCormick.

1Opinion of the Court

HOBBY, Judge.

This is an action of trespass to try title brought by the appellants, on the 13th day of January, 1886, against the appellees, to recover an undivided one-half interest in 1107 acres of land ■granted to Darwin M. Stapp.

The appellants deraign title to the land from and under the will of Thomas P. Rutledge, executed on January 7, 1848, and probated on April 29, 1850.

It was provided by the clause of the will under which appellants claim title that all property, real or personal, owned by the testator should vest first in Eliza Rutledge, his wife, for the period of twenty-one years…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Guilford v. LoveTexas Supreme Court · 1878
  2. Franks v. ChapmanTexas Supreme Court · 1883
  3. Hollis v. DashiellTexas Supreme Court · 1879
  4. Anderson v. StewartTexas Supreme Court · 1855
  5. Gunter v. FoxTexas Supreme Court · 1879

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by15 opinions

  1. County of Los Angeles v. WinansCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1910
  2. Southern Ornamental Iron Works v. MorrowCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1937
  3. Peters v. AllenCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1927
  4. Dew v. DewCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1900
  5. Gray v. SmithU.S. Circuit Court for the District of Northern California · 1896

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API