Legal Opinion

Hollis v. Dashiell

Texas Supreme Court

Decided November 21, 1879PublishedCited by 17 opinions

Appeal from Kaufman. Tried below before the Hon. J. E. Dillard, special judge. The case is stated in the opinion. The instructions of the court below arc too lengthy for insertion.

1Opinion of the Court

Gould, Associate Justice.

—The subject-matter of this litigation is a league and labor of land in Kaufman county, patented in the name of Benjamin Kimberling August 80, 1858. The headright certificate of said Kimberling, which was issued February 8, 1838, was first located in the name of Kimberling in Bastrop county, and in 1844 or 1845 was located on the land in controversy.

The heirs of William Hollis commenced this suit in April, 1875, bringing an action of trespass to try title against Dashiell and others. They sought to establish (1) an alleged transfer of his headright claim by Benjamin…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Shields v. HuntTexas Supreme Court · 1876
  2. Walters v. JewettTexas Supreme Court · 1866
  3. Gunter v. FoxTexas Supreme Court · 1879
  4. Barber v. GravesSupreme Court of Vermont · 1846

3Cited by17 opinions

  1. Stone v. BrownTexas Supreme Court · 1881
  2. Southern Ornamental Iron Works v. MorrowCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1937
  3. Threadgill v. ButlerTexas Supreme Court · 1884
  4. Marshall v. StubbsCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1907
  5. Williams v. TookeCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1938

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API