Legal Opinion
Cochrane v. Forbes
Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court
Decided October 13, 1926PublishedCited by 22 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtSanderson, J.
The plaintiffs are copartners and bring this suit to recover money alleged to have been paid by them for petroleum which the Boston Mexican Petroleum Trustees (hereinafter called the defendants) failed to deliver because of exhaustion of the Harmon well in Mexico, and to reach and apply certain stock held by them. The suit was begun June 30, 1922.
The defendants pleaded in bar the award of an arbitrator, filed in court May 13,1922. The report remained unopened until the hearing of this suit on the merits in the Superior Court and no judgment has been entered thereon. The plea that the award is…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Butterfield v. ByronMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1891
- Vickery v. RitchieMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1909
- Hawkes v. KehoeMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1907
- Smith v. HolcombMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1868
- Miles v. SchmidtMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1897
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by22 opinions
- State Highway Department v. MacDougald Construction Co.Supreme Court of Georgia · 1939
- Bowser v. ChalifourMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1956
- Cochrane v. ForbesMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1929
- Rodríguez López v. Municipio de CarolinaSupreme Court of Puerto Rico · 1953
- Baetjer v. New England Alcohol Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1946
17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.