Legal Opinion
Penza v. Neckles
District Court of Appeal of Florida
Decided December 17, 1976No. 75-689PublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
340 So.2d 1210 (1976)
Joseph P. PENZA, Appellant,
v.
Theodore NECKLES, Individually and Daniel Resnick, Individually D/B/a Crown Associates, Appellees.
No. 75-689.
District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District.
December 17, 1976.
Steve E. Moody, Moody & Jones, Fort Lauderdale, for appellant.
Michael J. Padula, Allsworth, Doumar, Schuler, Padula & Laystrom, Fort Lauderdale, for appellee-Theodore Neckles.
DOWNEY, Judge.
Joseph Penza sued Daniel Resnick (individually, and d/b/a Crown Associates) and Theodore Neckles in what was primarily a contract action (Circuit Court Case No. 73-5643). After a…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Gilbert v. . FinchNew York Court of Appeals · 1903
- Abb v. Northern Pacific Railway Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1902
- Atlantic Coast Line Railroad Company v. BooneSupreme Court of Florida · 1956
- Walsh v. . N.Y.C. H.R.R.R. Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1912
- McBride v. ScottMichigan Supreme Court · 1903
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Penza v. NecklesSupreme Court of Florida · 1977
- Deese v. MobleyDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1981
- Baker v. PeddieDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1985