Legal Opinion

Percy v. Hollister

Appellate Court of Illinois

Decided November 5, 1896PublishedCited by 1 opinion

Assumpsit, on a promissory note. Error to the Superior Court of Cook County; the Hon. Philip Stein, Judge, presiding. Heard in this court at the October term, 1896.

1Opinion of the Court

Mr. Presiding Justice Shepard

delivered’ the opinion of the Court.

This was a suit upon a promissory.note for $1,475, made-by the plaintiff in error to the defendant in error, dated August 1, .1888.

The plaintiff in error pleaded a want of consideration for the note, but upon a trial before the court, without a jury, the issues were found for the plaintiff below, and judgment given, for $2,153.50.

At the time the note was made and delivered, the defendant in error was the holder of a note for $800, drawing ten per cent interest, dated March 1, 1878, made by a firm of which the husband of the…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Stover v. MitchellIllinois Supreme Court · 1867
  2. Jackson v. HortonIllinois Supreme Court · 1888
  3. Gilek v. StockAppellate Court of Illinois · 1889

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Siegel, Cooper & Co. v. SchueckAppellate Court of Illinois · 1896

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API