Legal Opinion

Hollis v. Wyrosdick

Supreme Court of Alabama

Decided June 5, 1987No. 85-970PublishedCited by 15 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

This is an appeal from a jury verdict for the plaintiffs in a landowners' suit against the defendants, C.H. Hollis and the C.H. Hollis Timber Company. (The two defendants shall be referred to as "Hollis".) We affirm.

The plaintiffs, Rudolph Wyrosdick and his wife Jeanette, and Eddie Hill and his wife Judy, are coterminous landowners whose lands share a common boundary line with property owned by John N. Swartz. In September 1983, Swartz executed a timber deed to Hollis, which, for a stated consideration, conveyed to Hollis all the merchantable pine and hardwood timber on Swartz's land.

Before…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Cooper v. PeturisSupreme Court of Alabama · 1980
  2. Feazell v. CampbellSupreme Court of Alabama · 1978
  3. Hickox v. Vester Morgan, Inc.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1983
  4. Nationwide Mutual Insurance Company v. SmithSupreme Court of Alabama · 1966
  5. U-J Chevrolet Co., Inc. v. MarcusCourt of Civil Appeals of Alabama · 1984

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by15 opinions

  1. BMW of North America, Inc. v. GoreSupreme Court of the United States · 1996
  2. BMW of North America, Inc. v. GoreSupreme Court of Alabama · 1995
  3. Charter Hosp. of Mobile v. WeinbergSupreme Court of Alabama · 1990
  4. Mason and Dixon Lines, Inc. v. ByrdSupreme Court of Alabama · 1992
  5. IMAC Energy, Inc. v. TittleSupreme Court of Alabama · 1991

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API