Legal Opinion

State v. Bachicha

New Mexico Court of Appeals

Decided October 6, 1972No. 937PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

SUTIN, Judge.

Pursuant to a plea of guilty, Bachicha was sentenced for the unlawful possession of amphetamines. Section 54-6-38(B) (3), N.M. S.A. 1953 (Repl.Vol. 8, pt. 2, Supp. 1971). He appeals.

We affirm.

On September 7, 1971, with a court appointed attorney present, Bachicha entered a plea of not guilty. On November 10, 1971, through private counsel, Bachicha advised the court that he wished to change his plea to guilty.

This appeal has been undertaken by a third attorney, appointed by the court, and Bachicha was granted free process.

In its order filed the same day as the plea of…

Also in this document: Concurrence.

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. State v. ElledgeNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 1969

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. State v. VigilNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 1973
  2. State v. GunzelmanNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 1973
  3. Bachicha v. StateNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1972
  4. State v. GunzelmanNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 1973
  5. State v. VigilNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 1973

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API