Legal Opinion

Goudreau v. City of St. Ignace

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided November 10, 1893PublishedCited by 1 opinion

Error to Mackinac. (Pailthorp, J.) Assumpsit. Defendant brings error. The facts are stated in the opinion, and in 92 Mich. 332.

1Opinion of the CourtLong, J.

These causes were heard, in the circuit court for the county of Mackinac on August 5, 1891, before the court without a jury, and judgments rendered therein in favor of the plaintiffs. Stipulations had been signed by the attorneys of the respective parties, by which it was agreed that the facts were substantially the same as in the case of Eli B. Chamberlain v. City of St. Ignace (92 Mich. 332), and that the findings of the court in the cases should be of the same import and effect, except the items of taxes, which were set out in the stipulations. The same facts were found as in the.…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Chamberlain v. City of St. IgnaceMichigan Supreme Court · 1892

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Levy v. CunninghamNebraska Supreme Court · 1898

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API