Legal Opinion

North River Boom Co. v. Smith

Washington Supreme Court

Decided July 9, 1896No. 2210PublishedCited by 8 opinions

Appeal from Superior Court, Pacific County.— Hon. Fred L. Rice, Judge pro tem.

1Opinion of the Court

The opinion of the court was delivered by

Dunbar, J.

This is an appeal from a judgment rendered in an action brought to appropriate certain tide lands of the third class for boom purposes. A demurrer was interposed to the complaint, which was overruled. The defendants answered, and, upon trial, certain damages were awarded to the defendants, with which they were not satisfied, and from which judgment they have appealed to this court.

We think the petition stated facts sufficient to constitute a cause of action. The contention that the state should have been made a party to the action was fully…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Seattle & Montana Railway Co. v. StateWashington Supreme Court · 1893

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. State Ex. Rel. York v. B. of C. Com'rsWashington Supreme Court · 1947
  2. Healy Lumber Co. v. MorrisWashington Supreme Court · 1903
  3. Gasaway v. City of SeattleWashington Supreme Court · 1909
  4. Long v. OdellWashington Supreme Court · 1962
  5. State v. DavisWashington Supreme Court · 1952

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API