Legal Opinion

Leonard v. Kendall

Court of Appeals of Texas

Decided April 4, 1928No. 1656PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtWalker, J.

This suit was instituted by defendants in error, W. E. Kendall and T. H. Crawford, to recover of plaintiff in error, Sarah Leonard, the title and possession of lot No. 13, in block A, of the subdivision of J. S. Holman 10-acre lot 15 in the city of Houston. Her husband, Will Leonard, together with several other parties, was made defendant, but all of them went out of the case on the pleadings, except plaintiffs in error, Sarah Leonard and her husband, Will Leonard. On conclusion of the evidence, the trial court instructed a verdict for defendants in error pn the issue of title, and submitted…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Lanier v. Foust and DouglassTexas Supreme Court · 1891
  2. White v. ColeTexas Supreme Court · 1895
  3. Taber v. State of TexasCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1905
  4. Humble Oil & Refining Co. v. KishiCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1927
  5. Harvey v. Provident Inv. Co.Court of Appeals of Texas · 1913

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Texas Turnpike Company v. Dallas CountyTexas Supreme Court · 1954
  2. Furman v. SanchezCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1975
  3. Home Ins. Co. v. ShugarCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1931
  4. Untitled Texas Attorney General Opinion, Texas Attorney General Reports1940
  5. Untitled Texas Attorney General Opinion, Texas Attorney General Reports1967

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API