Legal Opinion

Terry Realty Co. v. Martin

Supreme Court of Alabama

Decided October 24, 1929No. 6 Div. 324PublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtBrown, J.

(after stating the facts as above). To authorize a recovery on the quantum meruit, under the common counts, it was incumbent on the plaintiff, not only to show services rendered at defendants’ instance, but the reasonable value of such services; and to recover on the common counts for services rendered under a special contract fixing the price of the services, plaintiff must show that he has fully performed the contract, leaving nothing to be done except the payment of the price by the defendant. Jonas v. King, 81 Ala. 285,1 So. 591.

The plaintiff, under the special contract, engaged to make…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Obermark v. ClarkSupreme Court of Alabama · 1927
  2. Jonas v. KingSupreme Court of Alabama · 1886

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. Holczstein v. Bessemer Trust & Savings BankSupreme Court of Alabama · 1931
  2. Fitzner Pontiac v. Perkins and Assoc.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1991
  3. Penney v. SpeakeSupreme Court of Alabama · 1951
  4. McCormick v. TissierSupreme Court of Alabama · 1931
  5. Ar-Con Building Specialties, Inc. v. Famco, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1973

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API