Legal Opinion

In Re Applied Chemical Magnesias Corp.

Texas Supreme Court

Decided August 31, 2006No. 04-1119PublishedCited by 67 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Green

In this venue case we consider whether a declaratory judgment suit to determine the rights of the parties to a contract to acquire surface and mineral leases is an action involving an interest in real property thus making it subject to the mandatory venue provision of section 15.011 of the Texas Civil Practice and Remedies Code. We conclude that it is and conditionally grant the writ of mandamus.

I. Background

Applied Chemical Magnesias Corporation (“Applied Chemical”) and Texas Architectural Aggregate, Inc. (“Aggregate”) executed a letter agreement for a proposal to excavate brucitic marble 1…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Walker v. PackerTexas Supreme Court · 1992
  2. In Re Missouri Pacific Railroad Co.Texas Supreme Court · 1999
  3. Renwar Oil Corporation v. LancasterTexas Supreme Court · 1955
  4. Smith v. HallTexas Supreme Court · 1949
  5. In Re Pepsico, Inc., Texas Court of Appeals, 6th District (Texarkana)2002

3Cited by67 opinions

  1. in Re Mark P. Hardwick, Individually and D/B/A Mark P. Hardwick Oil & Gas Properties and Mark P. Hardwick, LLC, Texas Court of Appeals, 1st District (Houston)2012
  2. In re LopezTexas Supreme Court · 2012
  3. Airvantage, L.L.C. v. TBAN Properties 1, L.T.D., Texas Court of Appeals, 5th District (Dallas)2008
  4. In Re City National Bank, Texas Court of Appeals, 12th District (Tyler)2008
  5. In Re Kerr, Texas Court of Appeals, 9th District (Beaumont)2009

62 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API