Legal Opinion

Thompson v. State of Colorado

Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit

Decided August 7, 2001No. 99-1045PublishedCited by 22 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MURPHY, Circuit Judge.

I. INTRODUCTION

Plaintiffs-Appellees brought a class action suit against Defendant-Appellant State of Colorado (“Colorado”). Plaintiffs claimed that the fee charged by Colorado for handicapped parking placards violated the Americans with Disabilities Act of 1990 (“ADA”) and implementing regulations. After stipulating to various facts, both parties moved for summary judgment. In its motion for summary judgment, Colorado argued that Plaintiffs’ claims were barred by the Eleventh Amendment. The district court granted Plaintiffs’ motion for summary judgment and denied…

2Cases cited45 opinions

  1. Chevron U. S. A. Inc. v. Natural Resources Defense Council, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1984
  2. Steel Co. v. Citizens for a Better EnvironmentSupreme Court of the United States · 1998
  3. Faretta v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1975
  4. Ex Parte YoungSupreme Court of the United States · 1908
  5. City of Cleburne v. Cleburne Living Center, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1985

40 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by22 opinions

  1. Melton v. Dallas Area Rapid TransitCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2004
  2. Reickenbacker v. FosterCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2001
  3. Garcia v. S.U.N.Y. Health Sciences Center Of BrooklynCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2001
  4. Garcia v. S.U.N.Y. Health Sciences Center of BrooklynCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2001
  5. Green v. North Arundel Hospital Association, Inc.Court of Appeals of Maryland · 2001

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API