Legal Opinion

United States v. George E. McAfee

Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit

Decided November 25, 1987No. 87-5551PublishedCited by 24 opinions

1Per curiam

I

George E. McAfee contends that a district court order ruling violates the double jeopardy clause. The order conformed an earlier entered sentence for escape to the court’s original intent that it run consecutively with rather than concurrently to the sentence McAfee was serving at the time of his escape.

II

During service of a sentence imposed in the Western District of Texas, McAfee was placed in a San Antonio halfway house in preparation for his release on parole. McAfee left the house on October 16, 1986 and did not return. After his arrest in January of 1987, McAfee pled guilty to a flight…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. United States v. Harold D. KindrickCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1978
  2. Arman A. Schurmann v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1981
  3. United States v. Richard G. NaasCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1985

3Cited by24 opinions

  1. United States v. Anthony F. DaddinoCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1993
  2. United States v. Hiram Stanley Sasser, IICourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1992
  3. Lykken v. ClassSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1997
  4. United States v. Daniel Ignatz Tramp, Also Known as Dan DaileyCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1994
  5. United States v. Frank O. BeckerCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1994

19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API