Legal Opinion
Minnesota Mining and Manufacturing Company v. Polychrome Corporation
Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit
Decided June 11, 1959No. 12585PublishedCited by 9 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
HASTINGS, Circuit Judge.
This appeal comes before us from an order of the district court denying a motion for an interlocutory injunction in a patent infringement action.
Plaintiff-appellee, Minnesota Mining and Manufacturing Company (Three M), brought suit in the district court against defendant-appellant, Polychrome Corporation (Polychrome) and three of its sales agents, for infringement of its Patent No. 2,714,066 covering presensitized metal lithographic plates. This complaint was filed August 1,1958. Subsequently, Polychrome answered, alleging, inter alia, invalidity of the patent in suit,…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Westinghouse Electric Corporation v. Free Sewing MacHine Co. And Apsco Products, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1958
- Doeskin Products, Inc. v. United Paper Co.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1952
- Mytinger & Casselberry, Inc. v. Numanna Laboratories Corp.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1954
- American Chemical Paint Company, a Corporation v. Thompson Chemical Corporation, a CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1957
- Weiner v. National Tinsel Mfg. Co.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1941
3Cited by9 opinions
- United States v. Fred A. Brown and Jennie B. Brown, Doing Business as Gem DairyCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1964
- General Foods Corporation v. Carnation CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1969
- Sundstrand Corporation v. American Brake Shoe CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1963
- Solex Laboratories, Inc. v. Plastic Contact Lens CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1959
- Polychrome Corp. v. Minnesota Mining & Manufacturing Co.District Court, S.D. New York · 1966
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.