Legal Opinion
United States v. Mario Joseph Baldrich
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Decided December 27, 2006No. 05-50676PublishedCited by 21 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
IKUTA, Circuit Judge.
Mario Baldrieh pleaded guilty to five counts of bank robbery and one count of attempted bank robbery in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 2113(a). At sentencing, the district court denied Baldrich’s request for disclosure of the United States probation officer’s confidential sentencing recommendation as allowed by Rule 32(e)(3) of the Federal Rules of Criminal Procedure. The district court also rejected Baldrich’s argument that he was entitled to a reduction in his offense level under section 3El.l(b) of the United States Sentencing Guidelines.
On appeal, Baldrieh raises two…
2Cases cited17 opinions
- Taylor v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1990
- Williams v. New YorkSupreme Court of the United States · 1949
- Gardner v. FloridaSupreme Court of the United States · 1977
- Burns v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1991
- Chandler v. Warden FretagSupreme Court of the United States · 1954
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by21 opinions
- United States v. JohnsonCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2009
- United States v. WhitlockCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2011
- United States v. Germaine BryantCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2014
- United States v. RakesCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2007
- United States v. Ollie PetersonCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2013
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.