Lanier v. Hoadley
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
Appeal by the defendant, Russell H. Hoádley, trustee, from a final judgment of the' Supreme Oourt in favor of the plaintiff, entered in the office of the clerk of the county of New York on the 31st day of October, 1898, upon the decision of the court rendered after a trial at the New York Special Term.
1Opinion of the Court
Ingraham, J.:
The action was brought to vacate; and set aside the satisfaction.of a certain mortgage made by the defendant Mary A. Milliken to one Sarah A. Hardy, for judgment that; the plaintiff became entitled to the said mortgage by subrogation' and to enforce the same. The action came on for trial at Special Term and resulted in a judg*7ment for the plaintiff, from which the defendant Russell H. Hoadley, as trustee, appeals.
The court below found that one Mary A. Milliken was the owner of the premises in question ; that, the said premises were subject to a mortgage executed by the said Mary…
2Cited by7 opinions
- Piltz v. Yonkers RailroadAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1903
- Baranowski v. WetzelAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1916
- Clements v. BealeAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1900
- Donellan v. KetchumAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1903
- Donellen v. KetchumAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1903
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.