Legal Opinion · Concurring in part, dissenting in part

Hanson v. Hanson

North Dakota Supreme Court

Decided April 16, 1987No. Civ. 11235Published

1Concurring in part, dissenting in partVande Walle, Justice

I dissent insofar as the majority opinion reverses the visitation restrictions.

We are not here merely concerned with a situation in which the custodial parent does not wish the children exposed to religious practices different from those of the custodial parent. Many of the cases cited in the majority opinion concern exactly that situation. For example, in Munoz v. Munoz, 79 Wash.2d 810, 489 P.2d 1133 (1971), the trial court determined it would be detrimental to the children to have them exposed to conflicting religious beliefs and concluded that the best interests of the children would be…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Munoz v. MunozWashington Supreme Court · 1971
  2. Felton v. FeltonMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1981
  3. Robertson v. RobertsonCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1978
  4. Brown v. SzakalNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1986
  5. Marriage of Andros v. AndrosCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1986

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API