Legal Opinion
Kazda v. Aetna Life Insurance Company
District Court, N.D. California
Decided April 26, 2022No. 3:19-cv-02512Unknown
1Opinion
1 2 3 4 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 5 NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 6 7 MICHALA KAZDA, Case No. 19-cv-02512-WHO 8 Plaintiff, ORDER GRANTING CLASS 9 v. CERTIFICATION 10 AETNA LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY, Re: Dkt. Nos. 80, 81, 84, 89, 90 Defendant. 11 12 13 Plaintiff Michala Kazda seeks certification of a class of people covered by Employee 14 Retirement Income Security Act (“ERISA”) health plans administered by defendant Aetna Life 15 Insurance Company (“Aetna”) whose claims for liposuction treatment of their lipedema were 16 denied as cosmetic. Her motion is GRANTED. Kazda has standing to seek…
2Cases cited18 opinions
- Lujan v. Defenders of WildlifeSupreme Court of the United States · 1992
- City of Los Angeles v. LyonsSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
- Nixon v. Warner Communications, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1978
- Wal-Mart Stores, Inc. v. DukesSupreme Court of the United States · 2011
- O'Shea v. LittletonSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.