Troy Waste Manufacturing Co. v. Saxony Woolen Mills
New York Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtParker, J.
The following question is presented for decision: “ Under the law as it stood in September, 1891, could a manufacturing corporation organized under the act of February 17, 1848, in contemplation of insolvency, make a general assignment for the benefit of creditors without preferences ? ”
The right of corporations, trading or religious, to make assignments, if not restrained by statute, seems to have been settled. DeRuyter v. St. Peter's Church, 3 N. Y. 238; Haxtun v. Bishop, 3 Wend. 13; Robinson v. Bank, 21 N. Y. 406; Hurbut v. Carter, 21 Barb. 221; Hill v. Reed, 16 id. 280.
The Revised…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Haxton v. BishopNew York Supreme Court · 1829
- Robinson v. . the Bank of AtticaNew York Court of Appeals · 1860
- Harris v. ThompsonNew York Supreme Court · 1853
- De Ruyter v. . St. Peter's ChurchNew York Court of Appeals · 1850
- Hurlbut v. CarterNew York Supreme Court · 1855
3Cited by2 opinions
- Bueb v. GeratyAppellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York · 1899
- Troy Waste Manufacturing Co. v. HarrisonNew York Supreme Court · 1893