Legal Opinion

Bueb v. Geraty

Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York

Decided June 15, 1899PublishedCited by 6 opinions

Appeal by the defendants from a determination of the General •Term of the City Court of the city of Yew York affirming a judgtpAnt of the Trial Term rendered on the verdict of a jury.

1Opinion of the CourtLeventritt, J.

The question involved on this appeal is the priority of the respective chattel mortgages of the plaintiff and the defendant Thomas Connery.

John J. Geraty and George H. Ball were copartners in business in the city of New York; Geraty lived in New York county, while Ball resided in Kings county.

The firm, in March, 1895, for money loaned, gave its promissory note, in the sum of $1,000, payable, on demand, to one Kerwin, who subsequently indorsed it over to the defendant Thomas Connery. In April, 1895, a second demand note, in the sum of $2,500, was made to the defendant Thomas Connery, likewise…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Stewart v. PlattSupreme Court of the United States · 1879
  2. Button v. . Rathbone, Sard Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1891
  3. Hubbardston Lumber Co. v. CovertMichigan Supreme Court · 1877
  4. Rich v. RobertsSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1860
  5. Doig v. HaverlyNew York Supreme Court · 1895

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. E. I. Du Pont de Nemours Powder Co. v. Jones Bros.District Court, S.D. Ohio · 1912
  2. Ament v. ZaharionAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1923
  3. Russell v. St. MartAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1903
  4. State v. Goins, Unpublished Decision (3-3-2006)Ohio Court of Appeals · 2006
  5. Bueb v. GeratyAppellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York · 1901

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API