Legal Opinion

Goldstein v. Conner

Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court

Decided May 24, 1912PublishedCited by 36 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtRugg, C. J.

This is a petition for a writ of mandamus* brought by a land owner in Malden to compel the building inspector of that city to issue to him a permit for the erection of a building. The city of Malden has accepted the provisions of c. 104 of the Revised Laws, whereby it might under § 1 “for the prevention of fire and the preservation of life, by ordinances . . . not inconsistent with law and applicable throughout the whole or any defined part of its territory, regulate the inspection, materials, construction, alteration and use of buildings and other structures within its limits.” In reliance…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Commonwealth v. MaletskyMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1909
  2. City of Newton v. BelgerMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1887
  3. Commonwealth v. ParksMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1892
  4. Commonwealth v. HaydenMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1912
  5. City of Salem v. MaynesMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1877

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by36 opinions

  1. General Outdoor Advertising Co. v. Department of Public WorksMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1935
  2. Druzik v. Board of Health of HaverhillMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1949
  3. Spector v. Building InspectorMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1924
  4. Green Point Savings Bank v. Board of Zoning AppealsNew York Court of Appeals · 1939
  5. Lemir Realty Corp. v. LarkinNew York Court of Appeals · 1962

31 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API