Legal Opinion

Nolan v. Reese

California Supreme Court

Decided July 1, 1867PublishedCited by 10 opinions

Appeal from the District Court, Fifteenth Judicial District, City and County of San Francisco. The plaintiff recovered judgment in the Court below, and the defendant appealed. The other facts are stated in the opinion of the Court.

1Opinion of the Court

By the Court, Shafter, J.:

This is an action to recover a street assessment levied in the City and County of San Francisco. The plaintiff sues as assignee of the original contractor.

First—The defendant offered to prove at the trial that the plaintiff’s assignor “ made a private contract with a part of the owners, but less than a majority of the frontage of the lots liable to be assessed, to do their work at a price less than that allowed by the contract made with the Street Superintendent ; which prevented defendant from securing a protest by the majority of the owners against the work, and…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Taylor v. PalmerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1866
  2. Emery v. San Francisco Gas Co.California Supreme Court · 1865
  3. Emery v. BradfordCalifornia Supreme Court · 1865
  4. Conlin v. SeamenCalifornia Supreme Court · 1863

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Chambers v. SatterleeCalifornia Supreme Court · 1871
  2. Oakland Paving Co. v. Whittell Realty Co.California Supreme Court · 1921
  3. Town of Tumwater v. PixWashington Supreme Court · 1897
  4. Himmelmann v. SpanagelCalifornia Supreme Court · 1870
  5. Himmelmann v. HoadleyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1872

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API