Legal Opinion

Fresh Grown Preserve Corp. v. United States

Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit

Decided May 31, 1944No. 9713PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MARTIN, Circuit Judge.

Charging adulteration and misbranding in violation of the Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act, 21 U.S.C.A. § 301 et seq., the United States, by its attorney for the Southern District of Ohio, filed a libel against one hundred ninety-six cases, containing six cans each, of an article of food labeled under six assorted flavors as “Nature’s Own Pure” blackberry, apricot, grape, loganberry, peach and raspberry jam. The libel alleged that ■ the appellant, Fresh Grown Preserve Corporation, had transported the food in interstate commerce from Kingsland, New Jersey, to East…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Clark v. BarnardSupreme Court of the United States · 1883
  2. Moses v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1897
  3. Four Hundred & Forty-Three Cans of Frozen Egg Product v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1912
  4. United States v. DieckerhoffSupreme Court of the United States · 1906
  5. Illinois Surety Co. v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1916

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. State v. ElderWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1968
  2. Harris v. Railway Express Agency, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1949
  3. Lauchert v. American S. S. Co.District Court, W.D. New York · 1946
  4. United States v. Aangamik 15 Calcium PangamateDistrict Court, N.D. Illinois · 1980
  5. State v. Gulf American Fire & Casualty Co.Tennessee Supreme Court · 1984

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API