Legal Opinion

Burns v. Bankers' Life Co.

District Court, W.D. Texas

Decided March 6, 1928No. 1087PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

WEST, District Judge.

The ease is submitted upon an agreed stipulation as to the governing facts. This memoranda will not contain the exact words of the stipulation, except to insure clarity. .

Plaintiff contends that the lapse or fori feiture of the policy was caused by the failure of the insured to pay premium, due September 25, 1924. Defendant contends that the maturity date of this same premi*715um was November 25, 1923. The insured died April 13, 1925. On that date the annual premium due on November 25, 1923, was, and still is, unpaid. If the forfeiture occurred on that date, the then cash…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. McMaster v. New York Life InsuranceSupreme Court of the United States · 1901
  2. State Mut. Life Ins. Co. v. RosenberryTexas Commission of Appeals · 1919
  3. Holly v. . Metropolitan Life Ins. Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1887
  4. Underwood v. Jefferson Standard Life InsuranceSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1919
  5. Union Mutual Life Insurance v. AdlerIndiana Court of Appeals · 1905

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Great American Indemnity Co. v. McMenaminCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1939
  2. Arbor Hill Concerned Citizens Neighborhood Ass'n v. County of AlbanyCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2008

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API