Legal Opinion
People v. Parrish
California Court of Appeal
Decided June 19, 2007No. B188975PublishedCited by 24 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
RUBIN, J.
Defendant and appellant Kaheal Jevon Parrish appeals from the judgment entered following a jury trial that resulted in his conviction of felony murder and two counts of attempted second degree robbery. He contends (1) he was denied the constitutional right of confrontation as a result of the admission into evidence of an accomplice’s out-of-court statements and (2) the trial court abused its discretion in admitting expert testimony concerning gangs. We affirm.
FACTUAL AND PROCEDURAL BACKGROUND
Viewed in accordance with the usual rules on appeal (People v. Kraft (2000) 23 Cal.4th…
2Cases cited17 opinions
- Crawford v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 2004
- Ohio v. RobertsSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
- Davis v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 2006
- Lilly v. VirginiaSupreme Court of the United States · 1999
- Beech Aircraft Corp. v. RaineySupreme Court of the United States · 1988
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by24 opinions
- People v. VinesCalifornia Supreme Court · 2011
- People v. MelendezCalifornia Supreme Court · 2016
- People v. BanosCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2009
- People v. JohnsonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2010
- State v. BrooksHawaii Intermediate Court of Appeals · 2011
19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.