State v. Brooks
Hawaii Intermediate Court of Appeals
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion of the Court by
NAKAMURA, C.J.
Defendant-Appellant Curtis Ray Brooks (Brooks) and Sistine Rangamar (Rangamar) were charged with the murder, kidnapping, and robbery of Ted Arifuku (Arifuku). Ran-gamar gave a statement to the police shortly after his arrest. In his statement, Rangamar admitted that he had assaulted, restrained, and robbed Arifuku, but also asserted that his actions had been pursuant to a plan devised by Brooks and implicated Brooks in Arifuku’s murder. Rangamar committed suicide before trial.
Brooks filed a pre-trial motion in limine, seeking authorization to introduce at…
2Cases cited22 opinions
- Crawford v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 2004
- Chambers v. MississippiSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
- Crane v. KentuckySupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- United States v. NoblesSupreme Court of the United States · 1975
- Taylor v. IllinoisSupreme Court of the United States · 1988
17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- People v. HopsonCalifornia Supreme Court · 2017
- State v. BennettWashington Supreme Court · 2026