Ring v. Minneapolis Street Railway Co.
Supreme Court of Minnesota
1Opinion of the Court
Olsen, 0.
Appeal by defendant from an order denying its motion for judgment notwithstanding the. verdict and granting plaintiff’s motion for a new trial on the sole issue of the amount of damages unless defendant shall consent to' an increase in the amount of damages.
The action is one to recover damages for personal injury to plaintiff sustained in a collision between one of defendant’s street cars and a fire truck of the city of Minneapolis at a street intersection in-that city. The plaintiff was a member of the fire department of the city and was riding on the truck," going to a fire. He was…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Cunningham v. City of Thief River FallsSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1901
- Koplitz v. City of St. PaulSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1902
- State v. SheppardSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1896
- Warren v. MendenhallSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1899
- Hubert v. GranzowSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1915
3Cited by9 opinions
- Bencich v. Market Street Railway Co.California Court of Appeal · 1937
- Nadeau v. MelinSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1961
- Bartholomew v. Oregonian Publishing Co.Oregon Supreme Court · 1950
- Veek v. Tacoma Suburban Lines, Inc.Washington Supreme Court · 1956
- Goeres v. GoeresNebraska Supreme Court · 1933
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.