Snowflake Laundry Co. v. MacDowell
Washington Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtWeaver, J.
Defendants New Model Laundry, Inc., a corporation, and Hugh T. MacDowell appeal from a $9,140.30 money judgment entered in favor of plaintiff Snowflake Laundry Co., a corporation.
In addition to the corporate parties, five individuals play important roles in a complicated factual pattern. They are: Frank T. Smith, president and principal stockholder of Snowflake; Edward Urich; Hayden F. Callaham; A. D. Tom-linson, president and principal stockholder of New Model; and Hugh T. MacDowell, son-in-law of Mr. Tomlinsori.
Considering the length of the record and the findings of fact entered by the…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Freeman v. NavarreWashington Supreme Court · 1955
- Turnbull v. SheltonWashington Supreme Court · 1955
- Westland Construction Co. v. Chris Berg, Inc.Washington Supreme Court · 1950
- Sullivan v. Boeing Aircraft Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1947
- Coombs v. R. D. Bodle Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1949
3Cited by13 opinions
- Larsen v. Walton Plywood Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1964
- Bernsen v. Big Bend Electric Cooperative, Inc.Court of Appeals of Washington · 1993
- Woodruff v. McClellanWashington Supreme Court · 1980
- Walker v. TRANSAMERICA TITLE INSURANCECourt of Appeals of Washington · 1992
- Kubista v. RomaineCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1975
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.