Legal Opinion

Snowflake Laundry Co. v. MacDowell

Washington Supreme Court

Decided July 31, 1958No. 34363PublishedCited by 13 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtWeaver, J.

Defendants New Model Laundry, Inc., a corporation, and Hugh T. MacDowell appeal from a $9,140.30 money judgment entered in favor of plaintiff Snowflake Laundry Co., a corporation.

In addition to the corporate parties, five individuals play important roles in a complicated factual pattern. They are: Frank T. Smith, president and principal stockholder of Snowflake; Edward Urich; Hayden F. Callaham; A. D. Tom-linson, president and principal stockholder of New Model; and Hugh T. MacDowell, son-in-law of Mr. Tomlinsori.

Considering the length of the record and the findings of fact entered by the…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Freeman v. NavarreWashington Supreme Court · 1955
  2. Turnbull v. SheltonWashington Supreme Court · 1955
  3. Westland Construction Co. v. Chris Berg, Inc.Washington Supreme Court · 1950
  4. Sullivan v. Boeing Aircraft Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1947
  5. Coombs v. R. D. Bodle Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1949

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. Larsen v. Walton Plywood Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1964
  2. Bernsen v. Big Bend Electric Cooperative, Inc.Court of Appeals of Washington · 1993
  3. Woodruff v. McClellanWashington Supreme Court · 1980
  4. Walker v. TRANSAMERICA TITLE INSURANCECourt of Appeals of Washington · 1992
  5. Kubista v. RomaineCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1975

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API