Legal Opinion

Federal Coke Corp. v. Driscoll

District Court, W.D. Pennsylvania

Decided March 27, 1939No. Nos. 8860, 8861PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

SCHOONMAKER, District Judge.

These two suits were tried together. They are actions by plaintiff, as successor and transferee of the Republic Connellsville Coke Company, to recover capital-stock taxes imposed upon that company under section 701 of the Revenue Act of ll93i Tit. 26 U.S.C.A. § 1358; Section 105 of the Revenue Act of 1935, and Section 401 of the Revenue Act of 1936, 26 U.S. C.A. § 1358a; because it is alleged that the company was not doing or carrying on business during the period' from July 1, ,1933, to June 30, 1936. Timely and proper refund claims were filed and rejected by .the…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Harmar Coal Co. v. HeinerCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1929
  2. Argonaut Consolidated Mining Co. v. AndersonCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1931
  3. New Haven Securities Co. v. BitgoodCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1937
  4. United States v. Atlantic Coast Line Co.Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1938
  5. Harmar Coal Co. v. HeinerDistrict Court, W.D. Pennsylvania · 1928

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Carnegie-Illinois Steel Corp. v. United StatesDistrict Court, W.D. Pennsylvania · 1939
  2. Federal Coke Corp. v. DriscollDistrict Court, W.D. Pennsylvania · 1939

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API