Legal Opinion

Doe v. Attorney General of the United States

Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit

Decided September 8, 2011No. 10-2272PublishedCited by 26 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

SMITH, Circuit Judge.

Petitioner Igor Rodov has been admitted to the United States as a lawful perma*268nent resident, and he would like to remain here. The government wants to remove him from the country, citing his conviction for aiding and abetting a wire fraud scheme that cost its victims more than $120,000. The Board of Immigration Appeals sided with the government, and Rodov seeks review in this court.

I

Rodov (who identifies himself by name throughout his unsealed court filings, notwithstanding the desire for anonymity suggested by the case caption) was first admitted to the United…

2Cases cited21 opinions

  1. Chevron U. S. A. Inc. v. Natural Resources Defense Council, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1984
  2. Beck v. OhioSupreme Court of the United States · 1964
  3. Johnson v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1948
  4. United States v. MarionSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
  5. Doggett v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1992

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by26 opinions

  1. Chiao Ku v. Attorney General United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2019
  2. Gonzaga-Ortega v. HolderCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2012
  3. Al-Sharif v. United States Citizenship & Immigration ServicesCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2013
  4. RIVENSBoard of Immigration Appeals · 2011
  5. Waseem Khan v. Attorney General United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2020

21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API