Bard v. Rabinfried Realty Co.
New York Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtCropsey, J.
Two foreclosure actions were tried together. They involve the same question. There is no controverted question of fact. The defendant Ritterman became the owner of the properties covered by the two mortgages in July, 1923. The mortgages in question had been placed on the property in June, 1923. They had not been executed by Ritterman, but by her grantor. The mortgages were installment mortgages, and in fact called for the payment of an installment on September 6, 1923, and quarterly thereafter. Defendant Ritterman, however, did not know that the installments were payable quarterly, or that…
2Cases cited21 opinions
- Noyes v. . AndersonNew York Court of Appeals · 1891
- Noyes v. ClarkNew York Court of Chancery · 1838
- Giles v. . AustinNew York Court of Appeals · 1875
- Livingston v. TompkinsNew York Court of Chancery · 1820
- Germania Life Insurance v. PotterAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1908
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Raines v. New York Central RailroadIllinois Supreme Court · 1972
- Bisno v. SaxCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1959