Legal Opinion
Johnson v. Riddle
Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit
Decided April 4, 2006No. 04-4036PublishedCited by 106 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
EBEL, Circuit Judge.
Defendants-Appellees Jesse Riddle and Riddle & Associates (collectively, “Riddle”) violated the Fair Debt Collection Practices Act (“FDCPA” or “Act”), 15 U.S.C. §§ 1692-1692o, by filing suit against Plaintiff-Appellant Brenda Johnson (“Johnson”) to recover statutory shoplifting penalties for a dishonored check under Utah law. See Johnson v. Riddle [hereinafter Johnson II], 305 F.3d 1107, 1121 (10th Cir. 2002). This case is now before us on appeal a second time, after our remand to the district court with instructions to determine whether the FDCPA’s bona fide error defense…
2Cases cited19 opinions
- William C. Lewis v. Acb Business Services, Inc., (96-3093/3498), American Express Travel Related Services Company, Inc. James P. Connors, (96-3498)Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1998
- Hutchinson v. PfeilCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1997
- Kort v. Diversified Collection Services, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2005
- Darlene Jenkins v. George W. Heintz and Bowman, Heintz, Boscia & McPheeCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1997
- Burnham v. Humphrey Hospitality Reit Trust, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2005
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by106 opinions
- Jerman v. Carlisle, McNellie, Rini, Kramer & Ulrich, L.P.A.Supreme Court of the United States · 2010
- Beck v. Maximus, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2006
- Ruth v. Triumph PartnershipsCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2009
- CA PARTNERS v. Spears, Texas Court of Appeals, 14th District (Houston)2008
- McCollough v. Johnson, Rodenburg & Lauinger, LLCCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2011
101 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.