Legal Opinion
State v. Hollenbeck
Supreme Court of New Hampshire
Decided September 5, 2012No. 2011-165PublishedCited by 15 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtDalianis, C.J.
The State appeals the order of the Superior Court (McHugh, J.) dismissing charges filed against the defendant, Burton G. Hollenbeck, Jr., Ph.D., because it determined that the statute upon which *157they were based, RSA 632-A:2,1(g)(1) (2007), violated his state and federal substantive due process rights. We reverse.
For the purposes of this appeal, the following facts are undisputed. At the time of the alleged crimes, the defendant was a licensed psychologist, who provided therapy to the complainant in 2007. Less than a year after the therapy ended, the two became sexually involved. In April…
2Cases cited25 opinions
- United States v. SalernoSupreme Court of the United States · 1987
- Collins v. City of Harker HeightsSupreme Court of the United States · 1992
- Washington v. GlucksbergSupreme Court of the United States · 1997
- Lawrence v. TexasSupreme Court of the United States · 2003
- United States v. StevensSupreme Court of the United States · 2010
20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by15 opinions
- State of Iowa v. Patrick EdouardSupreme Court of Iowa · 2014
- State v. AddisonSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 2013
- Doe v. StateSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 2015
- Dennis G. Huckins v. Mark McSweeney & a.Supreme Court of New Hampshire · 2014
- Annemarie Guare & a. v. State of New HampshireSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 2015
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.