Legal Opinion

Messimer v. Echols

Court of Appeals of Texas

Decided April 25, 1917No. 1786PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtLevy, J.

(after stating the facts as above). [1, 2] The appellants, not having filed a motion to set aside the findings of the jury, are not in a position to complain of the same. Railway Co. v. Weems et al., 184 S. W. 1102. And the appellants prepared and asked the court to submit to the jury certain special issues, which were by the court refused for the reason, as given by the court, that the 32 questions “were submitted to the court in- such shape the court could not submit one without submitting all of them, and part of these questions were submitted in the main charge.” Therefore this ruling of…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. First Nat. Bank of Plainview v. McWhorterCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1915
  2. Coughran v. EdmondsonTexas Supreme Court · 1915
  3. Johnson v. BurfordTexas Supreme Court · 1873
  4. Western Nat. Bank of Hereford v. LaughlinCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1916

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Pullman Co. v. McGowanCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1919
  2. Pottorff v. J. D. Adams Co.Court of Appeals of Texas · 1934
  3. Rankin v. ParkerCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1928
  4. Pascoe v. Keuhnast, Texas Court of Appeals, 10th District (Waco)1982

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API