Legal Opinion

Conrad v. Springfield Consolidated Railway Co.

Illinois Supreme Court

Decided April 23, 1909PublishedCited by 28 opinions

Appeal from the Appellate Court for the Third District ;—heard in that court on appeal from the Circuit Court of Sangamon, county; the Hon. Robert B. Shirley, Judge, presiding.

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Vickers

On August 21, 1906, James T. Conrad was employed as a lineman by the Central Union Telephone Company. On that day he was engaged in taking down and putting up telephone wires on a telephone pole at the corner of Sixth and Monroe streets, in the city of Springfield, and while so engaged an old telephone wire which he was handling broke and fell upon a trolley wire belonging to the Springfield Consolidated Railway Company, carrying a high voltage of electricity, which was thereby communicated to his person, causing severe personal injuries. In an action on the case against the street railway…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. B. Shoninger Co. v. MannIllinois Supreme Court · 1905
  2. Commonwealth Electric Co. v. RoseIllinois Supreme Court · 1905

3Cited by28 opinions

  1. Sweeney v. MatthewsAppellate Court of Illinois · 1968
  2. Barrett v. FritzIllinois Supreme Court · 1969
  3. Holsman v. Darling State Street Corp.Appellate Court of Illinois · 1955
  4. Gover v. Central Vermont Railway Co.Supreme Court of Vermont · 1922
  5. Maytnier v. RushAppellate Court of Illinois · 1967

23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API